This week we are asked to evaluate the same message but
given in a variety of manners. We all experience these types of communication
and in some cases, miscommunication. Formal communications and informal
communications need to be carefully constructed and thought about when working
with stakeholders as to not flip effective communication into miscommunication.
When reading the message in the multimedia program I thought
that maybe some tone of voice would help the reader understand the urgency of
the message. A written message can communicate factual data very efficiently but
does not allow the reader to ask questions or pick up on nonverbal
communication from the author as well (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shaffer, Sutton, 2008 ). The media features an email but it
could also be a text message in a less professional or formal setting. I
believe that texts and emails would have the same disadvantages. Perhaps in
order to utilize this form of communication, project managers and team members
should understand that this form should be utilized for documentation and
factual data sharing. I think that the message that was trying to be shared in
the program would probably not be effectively shared through written
communication simply because of a tone and nonverbal communication would be a
benefit in getting the message across.
The message on the telephone was a bit more improved in my
opinion. Unlike the email, the phone message was able to convey the tone of the
message by the voice and understand that the author of the message was simply
concerned about the report, not angry as I may have assumed in the email.
However, like the email, nonverbal communication is not available for the
message recipient to use to their advantage.
Lastly, the message in person was the most effective. Although
a personal message could provide some challenges such as finding the person you
wish to speak with, wasting time holding a discussion after the message is
given, and the message being undocumented,
verbal communication and meeting with the individual has its advantages (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shaffer, Sutton, 2008 ). By
meetings with the individual in question, you are providing the opportunity for
the receiver to ask questions, observe nonverbal communication, as well as hear
the tone of voice in the message author or communicator. This allows for the
least amount of misunderstanding to take place. Even if there was a
communication error in the message, the receiver could ask right away for
clarification which would improve efficiency of any project.
Understanding these advantages and disadvantages of specific
types of communication will allow any team member or project manager to be
clearer, more effective and straightforward with stakeholders and other team
members. Miscommunication can cause unrest in stakeholders, slow down progress
and can prevent a project from being successful.
The Art of
Communication. 2012. Walden University.
Portny, S., Mantel, S., Meredith, J., Shafer, S., Sutton, M.
2008. Project Management: Planning,
Scheduling, and Controlling Projects. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken NJ.
Meredith,
ReplyDeleteThere is definitely a fine line between a sense of urgency and being pushy, but knowing the difference is a matter of detail not easily understandable in text, yet far more obvious in speech, whether a voicemail or face-to-face. There are host of what those of us in Linguistics call prosodic features or prosody in general. Stress, tone, elocutionary force are all conveyed in this way and absent in textual mediums. When in doubt, it is best to simple ask in person, which you pointed out!